Racey v. USA

Filing 25

JUDGMENT ORDER as to Raymond Racey (2). Petitioner Raymond Racey's motion 1 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Racey's claim for relief due to his attorney's failure to file a notice of appeal as instructed is GRANTED. The judgment entered on October 15, 2015 (3:14-CR-89, Doc. 427 ) is VACATED, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to RE-ENTER that judgment as of this date. Racey's claim for relief for ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea bargain process is DENIED. However, a certificate of appealability is GRANTED with respect to this claim. If Racey files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Pamela L. Reeves on 4/24/20.(ADA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RAYMOND RACEY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Nos. 3:16-CV-619/ 3:14-CR-89 REEVES/GUYTON JUDGMENT ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Petitioner Raymond Racey’s motion [Doc. 1; 3:14CR-89 Doc. 527] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Racey’s claim for relief due to his attorney’s failure to file a notice of appeal as instructed is GRANTED. The judgment entered on October 15, 2015 [3:14-CR-89, Doc. 427] is VACATED, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to RE-ENTER that judgment as of this date. Racey’s claim for relief for ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea bargain process is DENIED. However, a certificate of appealability is GRANTED with respect to this claim. If Racey files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to close the civil case, Case No. 3:16-CV619. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________________ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT /s/ JOHN L. MEDEARIS CLERK OF COURT 1 Case 3:16-cv-00619-PLR-HBG Document 25 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 100

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?