Brawner et al v. Scott County, Tennessee et al (JRG1)

Filing 267

ORDER dismissing 248 Motion for Attorney Fees by Enforcing Attorney's Lien and Show Cause; adopting Report and Recommendations re 266 Report and Recommendations. Having reviewed the record, the Court agrees with Judge Mc Cook's recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). For the reasons set out in the Report and Recommendation, which the Co urt adopts and incorporates into this Order, the Motion to Enforce Attorney's Lien Filed by Weldon Patterson, Esq. and Show Cause [Doc. 248] is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/27/2024. (LCK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE TAMMY BRAWNER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SCOTT COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Defendant. No. 3:17-CV-00108-JRG-JEM ORDER This matter is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. 266], in which she recommends that the Court deny the Motion to Enforce Attorney’s Lien Filed by Weldon Patterson, Esq. and Show Cause [Doc. 248]. Attorney Weldon Patterson has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Having reviewed the record, the Court agrees with Judge McCook’s recommendation. The Court therefore ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). For the reasons set out in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into this Order, the Motion to Enforce Attorney’s Lien Filed by Weldon Patterson, Esq. and Show Cause [Doc. 248] is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. So ordered. ENTER. s/J. RONNIE GREER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?