Devereux et al v. Knox County, Tennessee, et al (JRG1)

Filing 94

ORDER finding that Dr. Gaines's disclosure is sufficient under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) and that the parties shall proceed with his deposition. Further, Defendants requested leave to file a Daubert motion with respect to Dr. Gaines 9;s opinion. The Court granted Defendants' request and ordered Defendants to file their motion within one week of receiving the transcript from Dr. Gaines's deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on November 26, 2018. (AYB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
BRIAN B. DEVEREUX and RENEE DEVEREUX, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)

No. 3:17-CV-197-JRG-HBG

ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Rules of this Court,
and Standing Order 13-02.
The parties appeared via telephone before the Court on November 26, 2018, over a
discovery dispute. Attorney Richard Collins was present on behalf of Plaintiffs. Attorney David
Wigler was present on behalf of Defendants. During the telephone conference, the parties reported
to the Court that Dr. Gaines’s deposition had been scheduled. Defendants asserted that Dr.
Gaines’s expert disclosure is insufficient under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B). The
Court found that Dr. Gaines’s disclosure is sufficient under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) and that the parties
shall proceed with his deposition. Further, Defendants requested leave to file a Daubert motion
with respect to Dr. Gaines’s opinion. The Court granted Defendants’ request and ordered
Defendants to file their motion within one week of receiving the transcript from Dr. Gaines’s
deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:

United States Magistrate Judge