Green v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Continue. The parties SHALL appear before the undersigned in Knoxville, Tennessee, at the United States District Courthouse (Courtroom 3B) on March 26, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., for a Scheduling Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin on 3/7/18. (JBR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
KAYLA GREEN, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
)
a Delaware limited partnership, OWNERS
)
RESOURCE GROUP, GC GP BUYER, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. 3:17-CV-314-CLC-DCP
ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Rules of this Court,
and Standing Order 13-02.
Now before the Court is an Unopposed Second Motion for Continuance of Scheduling
Conference [Doc. 24]. In their Motion, Defendants request a continuance of the March 15, 2018
Scheduling Conference. Defendants explain that their lead counsel, Attorney William Helfand, is
currently scheduled to attend the Claims and Litigation Management Conference from March 14
to March 16, 2018, in Houston, Texas. Further, Defendants state that the parties have agreed to
proceed before the undersigned in Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Scheduling Conference.
Defendants represent that the parties are available on March 26, 2018, or March 27, 2018.
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Unopposed Second Motion for Continuance of
Scheduling Conference [Doc. 24] is GRANTED.
The parties SHALL appear before the
undersigned in Knoxville, Tennessee, at the United States District Courthouse (Courtroom 3B) on
March 26, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., for a Scheduling Conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
_________________________
Debra C. Poplin
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?