Doe v. Gwyn

Filing 69

STIPULATED ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 6/16/20. (JBR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE DIVISION JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID B. RAUSCH, Director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00504 REEVES/GUYTON STIPULATED ORDER On April 5, 2018, this Court entered its Memorandum and Order (Doc. 24) granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym and for Protective Order (Doc. 14). The Protective Order provided that the Plaintiff’s identity not be disclosed, but further provided under paragraph 7 that “[i]f specific issues related to non-disclosure arise … the parties shall seek to resolve those issues without court intervention.” An issue has arisen in which Plaintiff needs the freedom to reveal that he is the John Doe in this case in a civil proceeding in state court. Thus, the Plaintiff seeks to be relieved of further compliance with the Protective Order. The parties have stipulated that either party may now reveal the identity of John Doe, subject to this court ordering that the Protective Order is of no further force and effect. 1 ACCORDINGLY, the parties having stipulated that either party may reveal the true identity of John Doe, the parties are relieved from complying with the terms of the Protective Order (Doc. 24) previously entered on April 5, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER: United States Magistrate Judge /s/Dianna Baker Shew____________ DIANNA BAKER SHEW, Counsel for Defendant BPR #012793 Senior Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 20207 Nashville, TN 37202-0207 (615) 532-1969 dianna.shew@ag.tn.gov /s/William S. Lockett, Jr. WILLIAM S. LOCKETT, JR., Counsel for Plaintiff BPR #010257 2816 Rocking Chair Way Knoxville, TN 37931 (865) 237-1886 soaperlockett@gmail.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?