Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Neyland Apartment Associates Five, LLC et al
Filing
35
ORDER, the Court finds the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record 34 well taken, and it is GRANTED. Attorney Tony Dalton is RELIEVED of his duties as counsel in this matter, and Attorney Charles Shepherd will remain as counsel of record for Defendant Neyland. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on 8/17/18. (ADA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
NEYLAND APARTMENT ASSOCIATES
FIVE, LLC, and CARSON R. GENTRY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:18-CV-89-HBG
ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Rule 73 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, and the consent of the parties, for all further proceedings, including entry
of judgment [Doc. 8].
Now before the Court is Tony R. Dalton’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record [Doc.
34], requesting that Attorney Dalton be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant
Neyland Apartment Associates Five, LLC (“Neyland”). Attorney Dalton states that he is leaving
his law firm effective August 31, 2018, to take another position as General Counsel for Priority
Ambulance, LLC. Attorney Dalton explains that Attorney Charles Shepherd will remain as
counsel of record for Defendant Neyland.
Because continuity of counsel is ensured, the Court finds the Motion to Withdraw as
Counsel of Record [Doc. 34] well taken, and it is GRANTED. See also E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(f)
(“Where a party is represented by multiple counsel of record, an attorney may withdraw, provided
the party is still being represented by another attorney of record, upon the filing of a notice of
withdrawal.”). Attorney Tony Dalton is RELIEVED of his duties as counsel in this matter, and
Attorney Charles Shepherd will remain as counsel of record for Defendant Neyland.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?