Beyer v. Faris Properties, LLC (JRG2)

Filing 62

ORDER adopting and approving re 41 Report and Recommendations; denying 23 Motion to Strike; granting 26 Motion to Amend/Correct. The defendant shall be granted leave to amend its answer to remove the phrase "demands strict proof thereof" and to remove Affirmative Defense No. 5. [Doc. 41 at 6]; see [Doc. 26-3]. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 03/25/2019. (AMP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JEREMIAH BEYER, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FARIS PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:18-CV-139 ORDER This matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated October 22, 2018, [Doc. 41]. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff’s motion to strike, [Doc. 23] be denied, and that defendant’s motion for leave to amend defendant’s answer to plaintiff’s complaint, [Doc. 26], be granted. Neither party has filed objections to the recommendation in the time allowed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Thus, after consideration of the record as a whole and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that this Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, [Doc. 41], that the plaintiff’s motion to strike, [Doc. 23] is DENIED and the defendant’s motion for leave to amend defendant’s answer to plaintiff’s complaint, [Doc. 26], is GRANTED. The defendant shall be granted leave to amend its answer to remove the phrase “demands strict proof thereof” and to remove Affirmative Defense No. 5. [Doc. 41 at 6]; see [Doc. 26-3]. So ordered. ENTER: s/J. RONNIE GREER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?