CapitalPlus Equity, LLC v. Tutor Perini Corporation et al (TV2)

Filing 61

ORDER: the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the R&R [Doc. 58] in full pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Movants' second motion to intervene [Doc. 50] is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on July 12, 2019. (AYB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
CAPITALPLUS EQUITY, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION and
TUTOR PERINI BUILDING CORP.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.:

3:18-CV-178-TAV-DCP

ORDER
This civil action is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”)
entered by United States Magistrate Judge Debra C. Poplin on May 31, 2019 [Doc. 58]. In
the R&R, the magistrate judge recommends that the Court deny the second motion to
intervene filed by The Espinosa Group, Inc., Juan Espinosa, Carol Espinosa, Michael
Espinosa, and Jamiju, LLC (collectively, “Movants”) [Doc. 50]. There have been no timely
objections filed to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat
any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
After careful review of the matter, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s
recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the R&R [Doc. 58] in full pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Movants’ second motion to intervene [Doc. 50] is hereby
DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE