Tidwell v. Hopkins et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 2/25/19. (copy mailed to Cleo Tidwell at Menard Correctional Center ) (JBR, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
CLEO TIDWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
R.M. HOPKINS and LAWRENCE
CIRCUIT CLERK,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: 3:18-MC-00066
REEVES/POPLIN
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is a pro se prisoner’s complaint. 1 On December 21, 2018, the Clerk docketed
Plaintiff’s complaint [Doc. 1] and sent Plaintiff a notice of deficiency notifying him that he must
pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis in order to proceed in this
action [Doc. 2]. Plaintiff returned this notice to the Clerk with a notation indicating that he did not
intend to file an action, but rather requested that the Court transfer his complaint to Lawrence
County under § 1406(a) [Doc. 4 p. 1].
The general venue statute for federal district courts provides in relevant part as follows:
A civil action may be brought in—(1) a judicial district in which any
defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in
which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a
substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim
occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the
action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may
otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district
in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction
with respect to such action.
1
While Plaintiff states that he did not intend to file an action in this Court [Doc. 4 p. 1], it
is apparent that Plaintiff seeks relief from the Court based on allegations that Defendants have
denied him due process and/or abused their power, though the only relief Plaintiff seeks is
acknowledgment of his complaint by stamping “received” on it [Id.]. Regardless, as the Court is
not the proper venue for this action for the reasons set forth herein, the Court will allow the
Southern District of Illinois to determine how to categorize Plaintiff’s complaint.
28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(b)(1)-(3). A federal district court may transfer a civil action to any district or
division where it could have been filed originally. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
In his complaint, Plaintiff claims that the Lawrence County Circuit Court has denied him
due process and abused its power by not acting on any of the petitions and/or letters he has sent to
that court regarding conditions at a prison over which it has jurisdiction and for which it is the
proper venue [Doc. 1 p. 1]. As relief, Plaintiff requests that this Court acknowledge his complaint
by stamping “received” on it, which he states “will be more than [he] has received from the
Lawrence Circuit Court last year and 2018” [Id.].
There is no Lawrence County in the Eastern District of Tennessee, however. 28 U.S.C. §
123. Further, Plaintiff is incarcerated in Menard, Illinois [Id. at 2], has named a “Circuit Clerk”
and a Circuit Court Judge from Lawrence County, Illinois in his complaint [Id. at 1], and requests
that this Court transfer this action pursuant to § 1406(a) [Doc. 4 p. 1]. Accordingly, it is apparent
that the events underlying Plaintiff’s complaint occurred in Lawrence County, Illinois, which lies
within the Southern District of Illinois. 28 U.S.C. § 93(c). The Court therefore concludes that the
proper venue for this case is the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
See O’Neill v. Battisti, 472 F.2d 789, 791 (6th Cir. 1972) (per curiam) (finding that venue in a suit
against a public official lies in the district where he performs his official duties).
As the Court is authorized to transfer a case such as this to another District “in the interest
of justice,” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the Clerk will be DIRECTED to transfer this action to the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois and to close this Court’s file.
AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.
___________________________________
______________________________________
_
_
_ _ _
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
A S S
C
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?