Rendina v. Seals et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT ORDER,Plaintiff's motion to dismiss his complaint 21 is GRANTED, and this pro se prisoner's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Further, the Court CERTIFIES that any appeal taken from this decision would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 3/30/20. (c/m) (ADA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
ANTHONY L. RENDINA,
Plaintiff,
v.
RHETT RUTLEDGE,
IAN MORLAND,
KYLE MILLER,
TREVOR TARWATER,
DAVID BUCHANAN,
FNU COLE,
FNU RUSS, and
FNU MAPLES,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No.:

3:19-CV-241-TAV-HBG

JUDGMENT ORDER
For the reasons expressed in the memorandum opinion filed herewith, Plaintiff’s
motion to dismiss his complaint [Doc. 21] is GRANTED, and this pro se prisoner’s complaint
is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).
Further, the Court CERTIFIES that any appeal taken from this decision would not be
taken in good faith, and therefore, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave
to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas A. Varlan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ John L. Medearis
CLERK OF COURT