Marlow v. United States Marshal Service

Filing 9

JUDGMENT ORDER, this prisoner's pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. §1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the mem orandum opinion and order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Charles E. Atchley, Jr on 6/4/21. (c/m)(ADA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE NATHANIEL S. MARLOW, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:21-CV-156-CEA-DCP JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion and order filed herewith, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner’s pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion and order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. SO ORDERED. /s/ Charles E. Atchley Jr. CHARLES E. ATCHLEY JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT /s/ LeAnna R. Wilson LEANNA R. WILSON CLERK OF COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?