Gedelman v. Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, P.A.
Filing
43
ORDER.This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.A separate judgment will enter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on January 7, 2025. (SAC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
CHRISTY GEDELMAN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
TENNESSEE ORTHOPAEDIC
ALLIANCE, P.A. d/b/a TENNESSEE
ORTHOPAEDIC CLINICS,
Defendant.
No. 3:23-cv-153-JEM
ORDER
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Rule 73 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, and the consent of the parties for all further proceedings, including entry
of judgment [Doc. 11].
On November 1, 2024, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement [Doc. 40]. Later, on
November 4, 2024, the Court directed the parties to file their stipulation of dismissal in accordance
with Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before December 2, 2024 [Doc. 41].
The parties did not file their stipulation as directed, so on December 5, 2024, the Court directed
the parties to file their stipulation on or before January 3, 2025 [Doc. 42]. The Court warned,
“Should they fail to do so, or should they fail seek an extension of this deadline prior to its
expiration, the Court will dismiss this matter” [Id.].
The parties did not file their stipulation by January 3, 2025, nor did they seek an extension
of this deadline. Given that, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 68.1. A separate judgment will enter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
__
Jill E. McCook
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?