Collins et al v. Murray Blackwelder, et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 9/16/08. (JGM, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE A T WINCHESTER T E R R Y COLLINS #335315, P l a in tif f , v. 4 :0 8 -c v -2 4 S H E R IF F MURRAY BLACKWELDER, e t al., D e f e n d a n ts . M E M O R A N D U M AND ORDER T h e court is in receipt of a pro se prisoner's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1 9 8 3 and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. It appears from the application that th e plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources to pay the $350.00 filing fee. Accordingly, p u r s u a n t to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file this action without the p re p a ym e n t of costs or fees or security therefor as of the date the complaint was received. H o w e v e r, for the reasons stated below, process shall not issue and this action is D IS M IS S E D . P lain tiff brought this action during his confinement in the Lincoln County Jail. His c o m p la in t contains a litany of alleged constitutional violations as the result of the conditions o f his confinement in the Lincoln County Jail. As defendants, plaintiff has named Sheriff M u rra y Blackwelder as well as numerous jail officials and employees. Plaintiff does not se e k compensatory damages, but only seeks injunctive relief as to the conditions in the jail. S h o r tly after this lawsuit was filed, plaintiff was transferred to the custody of the T e n n e ss e e Department of Correction and is currently housed at the Northwest Correctional C o m p lex in Tiptonville, Tennessee. Thus, plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief are moot. S e e Kensu v. Haigh, 87 F.3d 172, 175 (6th Cir. 1996) (a prisoner's claim for declaratory and in ju n c tiv e relief becomes moot upon his transfer to a different facility). Accordingly, b e c au s e plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, his action will be DISMISSED as MOOT. T h e court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and w o u ld be totally frivolous. See Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure B e c au s e the plaintiff is in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction, he is herewith ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1 9 1 5 (b )(1 )(A ) and (B), the custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account at the institution w h e re he now resides is directed to submit to the Clerk, U.S. District Court, 200 S. Jefferson S t., Room 201, Winchester, Tennessee 37398, as an initial partial payment, whichever is g re a te r of: (a ) tw e n ty percent (20%) of the average monthly deposits to the plaintiff's inmate tru st account; or 2 (b ) tw e n ty percent (20%) of the average monthly balance in the plaintiff's inmate tru st account for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. T h e re a f te r, the custodian shall submit twenty percent (20%) of the plaintiff's p re c ed in g monthly income (or income credited to the plaintiff's trust account for the p re c e d in g month), but only when such monthly income exceeds ten dollars ($10.00), until th e full filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00) as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 1 9 1 4 (a) has been paid to the Clerk. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). T h e Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the W a rd e n of the Northwest Correctional Complex, the Commissioner of the Tennessee D e p a rtm e n t of Correction, and the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee to ensure that th e custodian of the plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with that portion of the Prison L itig a tio n Reform Act relating to payment of the filing fee. The Clerk is further D I R E C T E D to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the court's financial d e p u t y. ENTER: /s/Harry S. Mattice, Jr. HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?