Beumer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 22

ORDER: the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's 21 Report and Recommendations. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the Commissioner's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED and this case shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 7/2/2010. (BJL)

Download PDF
Beumer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at WINCHESTER TERESA M. BEUMER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) on June 4, 2010 [Court Doc. 21]. Neither party filed objections within the given 14 days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b). Magistrate Judge Lee recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 17] be denied, that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 19] be granted, that the Commissioner's decision denying benefits be affirmed, and that the case be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 17] is DENIED and that the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 19] is GRANTED. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is Case No. 4:09-cv-33 Judge Mattice AFFIRMED and this case shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dockets.Justia.com SO ORDERED this 1st day of July, 2010. /s/Harry S. Mattice, Jr. HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?