Beach v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 30

ORDER denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on March 28, 2012. (CNH, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at WINCHESTER PATRICIA L. BEACH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. 4:10-cv-94 Judge Mattice Magistrate Judge Lee ORDER On January 26, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff has filed timely objections. (Doc. 28). The Court has reviewed the record and Magistrate Judge Lee’s Report and Recommendation de novo, including those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff objects. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff’s objections raise no new arguments but are largely reiterations of issues she previously raised in support of her Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Doc. 17). Further analysis of these same issues would be cumulative and is unwarranted in light of Magistrate Judge Lee’s well-reasoned and well-supported Report and Recommendation, in which she fully addressed Plaintiff’s arguments. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b) and Rule 72(b). Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 28) are OVERRULED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall close this case. SO ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2012. /s/Harry S. Mattice, Jr. HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?