Brewer v. American Medical Alert Corp. et al

Filing 68

ORDER: As explained in the accompanying memorandum, at the direction of Chief Judge Campbell, the undersigned has reconsidered his prior order denying defts' motions to disinter and autopsy, in light of the additional evidence submitted by defts . For the reasons expressed in the memorandum, the undersigned Magistrate Judge hereby VACATES his order of 9/15/09, 47 . The motions to disinter and autopsy (DE Nos. 18 , 36 , 40 ) are hereby GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge will reserve ruling on who will perform the decedent's autopsy, pending further discussion of the matter via telephone conference with the parties. A telephone conference with counsel is set for 2/2/10, at 1:30 p.m. Counsel for pltf shall initiate this call. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 1/20/10. (tmw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION CAROLYN SUE BREWER v. AMERICAN MEDICAL ALERT CORP., d/b/a VOICECARE, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:08-0069 Judge Campbell/Bryant ORDER As explained in the accompanying memorandum, at the direction of Chief Judge Campbell, the undersigned has reconsidered his prior order denying defendants' motions to disinter and autopsy, in light of the additional evidence submitted by defendants. For the reasons expressed in the memorandum, the undersigned Magistrate Judge hereby VACATES his order of September 15, 2009 (Docket Entry No. 47). The motions to disinter and autopsy (Docket Entry Nos. 18, 36, 40) are hereby GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge will reserve ruling on who will perform the decedent's autopsy, pending further discussion of the matter via telephone conference with the parties. A telephone conference with counsel is set for February 2, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. Counsel for plaintiff shall initiate this call. So ORDERED. s/ John S. Bryant _______________ JOHN S. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?