Boges v. General Motors Company et al
Filing
32
ORDER: By 4/22/2011, the parties shall file additional briefing stating their positions on whether Gossett bears on the court's analysis of the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 4/15/11. (dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
FRED BOGES,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 1:10-cv-00024
Judge Trauger
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY,
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC,
GENRAL MOTORS PRODUCT SERVICES, INC,
d/b/a GENERAL MOTORS OF SPRING HILL
Defendant.
ORDER
In evaluating the defendant’s summary judgment motion, it appears to the court that the
Tennessee Supreme Court’s analysis of the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework in
Gossett v. Tractor Supply Co., 320 S.W.3d 777 (Tenn. 2010) might have a bearing on the court’s
analysis. Gossett does not appear to have been cited by either party in briefing. Therefore, by
April 22, 2011, the parties shall file additional briefing stating their positions on whether Gossett
bears on the court’s analysis of the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
It is so Ordered.
Enter this 15th day of April 2011.
ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?