Pilkinton v. Hartsfield et al

Filing 28

ORDER: For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall file, by June 14, 2013, an affidavit setting forth a revised figure reflecting the total sum of p rincipal and interest he seeks to recover under the note in question. The defendants shall file any objection to the amount claimed by the plaintiff by June 21, 2013, after which the court will enter its judgment. It is so Ordered. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/3/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
JOHN PILKINTON,
Plaintiff,

v.
DAVID M. HARTSFIELD; CONNIE THOMASON,
as personal representative of MORRIS E. EZELL,
deceased; and BRIDGNORTH PARTNERS,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:12-cv-0026
Judge Trauger

ORDER
For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Docket No. 14) is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall file, by June 14, 2013,
an affidavit setting forth a revised figure reflecting the total sum of principal and interest he seeks
to recover under the note in question. The defendants shall file any objection to the amount
claimed by the plaintiff by June 21, 2013, after which the court will enter its judgment.

It is so Ordered.
Enter this 3rd day of June 2013.
_______________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge

1