Crowder v. Marshall County, Tennessee et al
Filing
54
ORDER: Therefore, counsel for the parties shall file a joint status report by 4/25/2014, indicating whether the telephonic deposition has been taken and, if not, whether firm arrangements have been made for the telephonic deposition, and when it i s scheduled, so that it is clear to the Court whether or not the plaintiff's motion to reconsider 51 has been resolved. As addressed during the telephone conference call with counsel for the parties and the Court on 4/2/2014, the 4/2/2014, deadline for completion of discovery was extended to 5/2/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/17/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
NANCY CROWDER, as attorney in fact
for Billy Vestal
v.
MARSHALL COUNTY, TENNESSEE;
and DONNELL KELLY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1-13-0003
ORDER
In accord with the order entered April 3, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 52), defendant Marshall
County filed a status report on April 16, 2014, concerning a telephonic deposition of Billy Vestal
(Docket Entry No. 53).
Although it appears that the parties will probably be able to take a telephonic deposition, the
plans have not been finalized.
Therefore, counsel for the parties shall file a joint status report by April 25, 2014, indicating
whether the telephonic deposition has been taken and, if not, whether firm arrangements have been
made for the telephonic deposition, and when it is scheduled, so that it is clear to the Court whether
or not the plaintiff's motion to reconsider (Docket Entry No. 51) has been resolved.
As addressed during the telephone conference call with counsel for the parties and the Court
on April 2, 2014, the April 2, 2014, deadline for completion of discovery was extended to May 2,
2014.
It is so ORDERED.
JULIET GRIFFIN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?