Voorhies v. Social Security Administration
Filing
30
ORDER: Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well- founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's 19 Motion and REVERSES and REMANDS this case for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 4/19/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
NICHOLAS SHANE VOORHIES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:13-cv-00007
Judge Nixon
Magistrate Judge Bryant
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Motion”) (Doc.
No. 19), filed with a memorandum in support (Doc. No. 18). Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security filed a Response opposing Plaintiff’s Motion. (Doc. No. 23.) Subsequently, Magistrate Judge
Bryant issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the Motion be granted, that
the Social Security Administration’s decision be reversed, and that this case be remanded for further
administrative proceedings consistent with the Report. (Doc. No. 28 at 17.) The Report was filed on
April 1, 2016, and provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id.)
Neither party has filed an objection to date.
Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its
entirety.
Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and REVERSES and
REMANDS this case for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report. The Clerk of
the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered this the 19th day of April, 2016.
________________________________
JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?