Barnett v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER: Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 3/31/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION KIMBERLY KAY BARNETT, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 1:13-cv-00047 Judge Nixon Magistrate Judge Brown ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kimberly Kay Barnett’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 13), filed with a Brief in Support (Doc. No. 13-1). Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response opposing the Motion (Doc. No. 14), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. No. 16). Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Brown issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the Motion be granted and the case be remanded for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 18 at 18.) The Report was filed on March 11, 2014, and provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id.) Neither party has filed an objection to date. Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Entered this the _28st_ day of March, 2014. ________________________________ JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?