Meeks v. Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) et al
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 81 ) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendant Corrections Corporation of America's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 59 ) is GRANTED and Meeks' remaining retaliation cla ims under the Americans with Disabilities Act are DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/27/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab) Modified on 9/28/2017 (ab).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
DANNY RAY MEEKS,
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Meeks’ Motion to Alter
or Amend Order (Doc. No. 78) is DENIED. Defendant Tennessee Department of Corrections’
Request for Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Order (Doc. No.
83), and Meeks’ Request for Leave to File Reply in Support of His Motion to Alter or Amend
(Doc. No. 93) are GRANTED.
Meeks’ Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for
Extension of Time (Doc. No. 85) is DENIED.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 81) is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Defendant Corrections Corporation of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. No. 59) is GRANTED and Meeks’ remaining retaliation claims under the Americans with
Disabilities Act are DISMISSED. Meeks’ Motion for De Novo Determination by the District
Judge (Doc. No. 87) is DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Procedure 58. The Court
CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. §
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?