McKinney v. Johnson et al

Filing 88

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 87), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 81 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedi es. The July 10, 2017 pretrial conference and July 25, 2017 trial are CANCELED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (2012). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/7/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (eh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION WALTER MCKINNEY, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA JOHNSON, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:15-cv-00061 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 87), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 81) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The July 10, 2017 pretrial conference and July 25, 2017 trial are CANCELED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (2012). IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?