Adams v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
Filing
228
ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ( 214 ) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/4/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
MICHAEL BRANDON ADAMS,
Plaintiff,
v.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 1:15-cv-00115
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
No. 227), which was filed on September 14, 2018. Through the Report and Recommendation,
the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 214)
be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Although the Report advised the
parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 214)
is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED, with prejudice.
This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
It is so ORDERED.
________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?