Grier v. Southern Health Providers et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Having considered the matter de novo as required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Docket No . 25 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/8/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JEFFREY GRIER, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PROVIDERS et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:16-cv-0019 Judge Sharp Magistrate Judge Bryant ORDER Plaintiff Jeffrey Grier is a pre-trial detainee at the Marshall County Jail in Lewisburg, Tennessee. He alleges that a nurse at the Jail has denied him prescribed medication for serious medical problems and that Defendants had him placed in an isolation unit for seeking help at a local emergency room. Plaintiff filed his Complaint (Docket No. 1) in March 2016 and the Court granted his motion to proceed in forma pauperis soon thereafter. (Docket No. 3). The order directed Plaintiff to complete the service packed and return it to the Clerk’s office, which Plaintiff failed to do. On June 13, 2016, Magistrate Judge Bryant issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiff to show why his case should not be dismissed for his failure to return the service packet at instructed. (Docket No. 6). Plaintiff did not reply to the Order to Show Cause and still has yet to return the service packet. Magistrate Judge Bryant has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No. 9) in which he recommends that this case be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order. Despite being advised that any objection needed to be filed within fourteen days, plaintiff has filed none. Having considered the matter de novo as required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 25) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. _______________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?