Ford v. United States of America
Filing
7
ORDER: Pending before the Court are the Petitioner's Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence In Accordance With 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 1 ), and the Government's Response thereto. (Doc. No. 4 ). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Petitioner's Motion (Doc. No. 1 ) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/6/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
MITCHELL JEROD FORD
Petitioner
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 1:16-cv-00050
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Pending before the Court are the Petitioner’s Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct
Sentence In Accordance With 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 1), and the Government’s Response
thereto. (Doc. No. 4). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Petitioner’s
Motion (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.
This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
Should the Petitioner give timely notice of an appeal from this Order, and the accompanying
Memorandum, such notice shall be treated as a application for a certificate of appealability, 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c), which will not issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?