Dodson v. Phillips

Filing 63

ORDER: The Petitioner has not filed any Objections. Regardless, the Court has conducted a de novo review and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's analysis is correct. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 61 ) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Emergency Motion (Doc. No. 54 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal of the claim in a Section 1983 case. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge under the existing referral. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/24/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION BRIAN JERMAINE DODSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. CHERRY LINDAMOOD, Respondent. NO. 1:16-cv-00060 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Before the Court in this habeas corpus case is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 61) concerning Petitioner’s Emergency Motion for Immediate Medical Treatment and Neurological Examination. The Magistrate Judge concludes that, based upon governing precedent, the Emergency Motion raises an Eighth Amendment/conditions of confinement constitutional claim that must be brought in a Section 1983 action rather than ancillary to a habeas corpus claim. (Id. at 2-3.) The Petitioner has not filed any Objections. Regardless, the Court has conducted a de novo review and concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s analysis is correct. 1 Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 61) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Emergency Motion (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal of the claim in a Section 1983 case. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge under the existing referral. 1 In the Emergency Motion, Petitioner explicitly acknowledges that the Court’s “authority under 42 U.S.C. §1983” could “provide [Petitioner] relief under the circumstances.” (Doc. No. 54 at 7.) IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?