Dyer v. Social Security Administration

Filing 42

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, the decision of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED. This action is DISMISS ED, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/27/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION WILLIAM A. DYER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-cv-00067 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVIS ORDER This case has been transferred to the undersigned Judge. Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40), which was filed on May 31, 2018. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge finds that the decision of the Social Security Administration is supported by substantial evidence, and recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment Based on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 37) be denied. Although the Report advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, the decision of the Social Security Administration is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. It is so ORDERED. ________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?