Sexton et al v. Mood et al

Filing 52

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 48 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This O rder shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 2/25/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION HUBERT GLENN SEXTON and GENE STANLEY, Plaintiffs, v. CHERRY LINDAMOOD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-cv-00071 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY ORDER Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 51), which was filed on February 7, 2019. Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 48) be granted and this action be dismissed with prejudice. Although the Report advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 48) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. It is so ORDERED. ________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?