Stewart v. Ford

Filing 31

ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 28 ), to which Plaintiff did not object. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Rep ort and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/17/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (mg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
DALLAS JAY STEWART,
Petitioner,
v.
TAMMY FORD,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 1:16-cv-00081
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.
No. 28), to which Plaintiff did not object. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation
and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE