Smith v. Lindamood et al
Filing
33
ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation 32 and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/5/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
VAN SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHERRY LINDAMOOD, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 1:16-cv-00086
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FRENSLEY
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,
recommending Plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. No. 32).
On July 30, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered an order requiring Plaintiff to file with the
Court within 14 days a written explanation showing cause for his failure to serve Defendants within
90 days after the filing of the Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (Doc. No. 31). Because
Plaintiff failed to file a written explanation, the Magistrate Judge recommends his case be
dismissed without prejudice. (Id.). The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that any objections to
the Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of service, and no objections
were filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk
is directed to close the file.
It is so ORDERED.
____________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?