Russell v. Campbell et al

Filing 52

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36 ) filed by Defendants Otis Campbell, Jr., M.D., Ellen Fowlkes, R.N., Amanda Davis, R.N., and Linda Flowers, R.N. is hereby GRANT ED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's federal claims for deliberate indifference against Defendants Ellen Fowlkes and Amanda Davis as set forth in Counts I and III of the Complaint, but DENIED with respect to those claims against Defendants Otis Campbell, Jr. and Linda Flowers.Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/17/2017. (mg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION CYNTHIA SMITH RUSSELL, Individually, and as Adminstratix of the ESTATE OF JASON WAYNE HENDRIX, Deceased, and on behalf of all other wrongful death beneficiaries, Plaintiff, v. OTIS CAMPBELL, JR., M.D; ELLEN FOWLKES, R.N.; AMANDA DAVIS, R.N.; LINDA FLOWERS, R.N.; and MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:16-cv-00098 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36) filed by Defendants Otis Campbell, Jr., M.D., Ellen Fowlkes, R.N., Amanda Davis, R.N., and Linda Flowers, R.N. is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s federal claims for deliberate indifference against Defendants Ellen Fowlkes and Amanda Davis as set forth in Counts I and III of the Complaint, but DENIED with respect to those claims against Defendants Otis Campbell, Jr. and Linda Flowers. IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?