Scott v. Lindamood et al
Filing
32
ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Bright's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. This Order shal l constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 7/24/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
MITCHELL SCOTT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
WARDEN CHERRY LINDAMOOD, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
NO. 1:17-cv-00007
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOLMES
ORDER
This case has been reassigned to the undersigned Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
No. 30), which was filed on June 13, 2018. Through the Report and Recommendation, the
Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant Donald Bright’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 27) be granted, and this action be dismissed. Although the Report advised the parties that
any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and concludes it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, Defendant Bright’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 27) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the final
judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
It is so ORDERED.
________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?