Hardin v. Rowland et al

Filing 43

ORDER: Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which was filed on January 12, 2022. (Doc. No. 41 ). Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 4/4/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION CORTEZ HARDIN, SR., Plaintiff, v. BUCKY ROWLAND, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:17-cv-00097 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY ORDER Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which was filed on January 12, 2022. (Doc. No. 41). Through the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. It is so ORDERED. ________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE      

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?