Hardin v. Rowland et al
Filing
43
ORDER: Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which was filed on January 12, 2022. (Doc. No. 41 ). Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 4/4/2022. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COLUMBIA DIVISION
CORTEZ HARDIN, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
BUCKY ROWLAND, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 1:17-cv-00097
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which
was filed on January 12, 2022. (Doc. No. 41). Through the Report and Recommendation, the
Magistrate Judge recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although the Report and Recommendation advised the
parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is
directed to close the file.
It is so ORDERED.
________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?