Eads v. State of Tennessee et al

Filing 107

ORDER: denying 46 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 71 Motion to Strike; adopting Report and Recommendations re 98 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 6/12/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MITCHELL EADS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:18-cv-00042 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY ORDER Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 46) and Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 71.) The Magistrate Judge recommends that the motions be denied. (Doc. No. 98.) In the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 46) Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendants provide him with law books and legal reference materials while he is in segregation in TCIX. Defendants argued that the motion is moot because Plaintiff has been transferred to another facility and is no longer housed at TCIX. (Doc. No. 60.) Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Defendant’s Response arguing that the response is “immaterial and impertinent.” (Doc. No. 71.) The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Plaintiff’s motions. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings were to be filed within fourteen days of service. (Doc. No. 98 at 4-5.) No objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 98) and concludes that it should be ADOPTED and APPROVED. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 46) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 71) are DENIED. It is so ORDERED. _________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?