Owens v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
28
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Pltf's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, 14 , is GRANTED to the extent that this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) becaus e the Administrative Law Judge committed legal error in failing to comply with the mandate of this Court. The Deft's Motion for Summary Judgment, 23 , is DENIED. This case is REMANDED with instructions to the Administrative Law Judge to strictly comply with the instructions set forth in the Court's March 30, 2006 order in resolving Pltf's claim. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 12/2/09. (tmw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
MARTHA E. MIRACLE OWENS, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security.
) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
2:07-0069
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Griffin in which she recommends that the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record be granted, this case be remanded, and the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. The Court has considered the report of the Magistrate Judge and finds that the report is correct in law and fact. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, Document #14, is GRANTED to the extent that this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) because the Administrative Law Judge committed legal error in failing to comply with the mandate of this Court. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Document #23, is DENIED. This case is REMANDED with instructions to the Administrative Law Judge to strictly comply with the instructions set forth in the Court's March 30, 2006 order in resolving Plaintiff's claim. It is so ORDERED.
Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr. Senior U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?