McAmis v. Astrue

Filing 46

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is adopted by this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Defendant's Motion for Judgment, 32 , is GRANTED, the Defendant's Motion for Judgment, 40 , is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for purposes of developing the record of prior awards and proceedings related to Plaintiff's mental functioning and any further evidentiary development that the Administrative Law Judge may deem necessary. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas Wiseman on 3/17/10. (dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION SUSAN E. McAMIS, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER 2:08-cv-0095 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bryant in which he recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment be GRANTED, Defendant's Motion for Judgment be DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. No objections have been filed. The Court has read and considered the report of the Magistrate Judge and finds that the report is correct in law and fact. The Report and Recommendation is adopted by this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Defendant's Motion for Judgment, Document #32, is GRANTED, the Defendant's Motion for Judgment, Document #40, is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for purposes of developing the record of prior awards and proceedings related to Plaintiff's mental functioning and any further evidentiary development that the Administrative Law Judge may deem necessary. It is so ORDERED. Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr. Senior U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?