John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Sullivan et al

Filing 27

ORDER: Telephone Conference set 4/22/2010 at 3:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/8/10. (af)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.)1 v. CHERYL SULLIVAN; TYLER SULLIVAN; JOE H. SULLIVAN; VAUDA SULLIVAN; and DAPHNE JACOB ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2-09-0100 ORDER Pursuant to the order entered April 2, 2010 (Docket Entry No. 26), counsel called the Court on April 8, 2010, at which time counsel advised that they were continuing to make progress towards a final resolution of this case, that counsel for defendants Joe Sullivan, Vauda Sullivan and Daphne Jacob ("the family defendants") had sent a proposed settlement agreement and trust agreement to counsel for Cheryl Sullivan, that counsel have scheduled a meeting on April 14, 2010, to attempt to work out language and "bank" issues, and that counsel for the family defendants plans to meet with her clients on April 16, 2010. Counsel for the parties shall convene a telephone conference call with the Court on Thursday, April 22, 2010, at 3:00 p.m., to be initiated by counsel for the family defendants, to address whether a full settlement has been reached. If the parties have made filings reflecting a settlement of this case prior to the conference call, counsel shall still convene the conference call to address attribution of the interest earned on the interpled funds, whether the settlement must be approved by the Court inasmuch as a minor child is involved, and any other matters related to a settlement in this case. It is so ORDERED. JULIET GRIFFIN United States Magistrate Judge By order entered January 21, 2010 (Docket Entry No. 22), the plaintiff was terminated as a party in this interpleader action. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?