Carroll et al v. Fentress Co Sheriff Depart. et al
Filing
250
ORDER: The Warden or the Jailor of the Whiteville Correctional Facility, 1440 Union Springs Road, P.O. Box 679, Whiteville, TN 38075, where plaintiff King is incarcerated, is hereby ORDERED to produce William Carter King, #258469, on August 12, 201 3, on or before 1:00 p.m., for a pretrial hearing in Courtroom 776, U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/11/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail and Warden/Jailor of Whiteville Correctional Facility by certified mail, and by fax to Sgt. Rita Reed of TDOC.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la) Modified text on 7/11/2013 (la).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COOKEVILLE DIVISION
JOSHUA LEE CARROLL and WILLIAM )
CARTER KING,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
FENTRESS COUNTY SHERIFF’S
)
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No: 2:11-0019
Judge Sharp/Bryant
Jury Demand
O R D E R
The Warden or the Jailor of the Whiteville Correctional
Facility, 1440 Union Springs Road, P.O. Box 679, Whiteville, TN
38075, where plaintiff King is incarcerated, is hereby ORDERED to
produce William Carter King, #258469, on August 12, 2013, on or
before 1:00 p.m., for a pretrial hearing in Courtroom 776, U.S.
Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee.
of
the
hearing,
the
plaintiff
shall
be
At the conclusion
returned
to
said
institution. If the plaintiff is no longer in custody, plaintiff is
advised that failure to appear for this hearing may lead to a
recommendation to the District Judge that this action be dismissed
for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and Tingler v. Marshall, 716 F.2d 1109, 1112 (6th
Cir. 1983), that allows a District Court to dismiss an action upon
its own motion.
It is so ORDERED.
s/ John S. Bryant
JOHN S. BRYANT
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?