Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. The Consulting Group, Inc. et al
Filing
274
ORDER: The matter was set for a hearing on August 5, 2014 (Docket Entry261). The parties have now filed a proposed consent order addressing the underlying motion (Docket Entry 270). The Magistrate Judge finds that the motion is well-taken and comme nds the parties for resolving this issue for the present time. The Magistrate Judge will sign the consent order and the hearing on the matter is CANCELED. The Clerk will also terminate as moot the motions to strike Docket Entries 257 and 259. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/4/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COOKEVILLE DIVISION
WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INC.,
Plaintiff
v.
THE CONSULTING GROUP, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:12-0096
Judge Trauger/Brown
Jury Demand
O R D E R
Presently pending before the undersigned is a motion to
prohibit destruction of evidence (Docket Entry 238); motion to
strike certain responses to that motion (Docket Entry 248); motion
to strike Docket Entry 255 (Docket Entry 257); and motion to strike
Docket Entry 258 (Docket Entry 259). This matter was referred to
the undersigned for a decision by Judge Trauger (Docket Entry 242).
The matter was set for a hearing on August 5, 2014 (Docket Entry
261).
The parties have now filed a proposed consent order
addressing the underlying motion (Docket Entry 270).
The Magistrate Judge finds that the motion is well-taken
and commends the parties for resolving this issue for the present
time. The Magistrate Judge will sign the consent order and the
hearing on the matter is CANCELED. The Clerk will also terminate as
moot the motions to strike Docket Entries 257 and 259.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?