Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. The Consulting Group, Inc. et al

Filing 275

CONSENT ORDER regarding 238 Motion to Prohibit Destruction of Evidence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/4/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ______________________________________________________________________________ WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INC., Plaintiff, VS. Case No. 2:12-cv-00096 THE CONSULTANT GROUP, et al. JURY DEMAND Defendants. Magistrate Judge Brown ______________________________________________________________________________ CONSENT ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROHIBIT DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE ______________________________________________________________________________ The Plaintiff, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., and Defendant, Smokey Mountain Getaways at Town Square, LLC, (“SMG”) are in agreement and it further appearing to the Court that there is good cause for entry of this Consent Order as to Plaintiff’s Motion to Prohibit Destruction of Evidence as to SMG (DE 238) as follows: (1) SMG agrees to preserve all relevant and/or discoverable documents or information relating to this litigation and will not discard or destroy any such documents or information including consumer complaints or requests for rescission that reference Wyndham or concern consumers identified by Wyndham; (2) In regard to Requests for Production 4 and 5, SMG will produce all consumer complaints and requests for rescission of consumers either identified by Wyndham or identifiable as Wyndham timeshare owners. SMG will produce these documents on or before August 18, 2014; 1 (3) SMG will produce the entire content of its customer files for Wyndham owners including, but not limited to, Wyndham owner files previously produced and such production will be based on customers identified by Wyndham and/or documents referencing or identifying a customer as a Wyndham timeshare owner. SMG will produce these documents on or before August 7, 2014; (4) Wyndham dismisses without prejudice its Motion to Prohibit Destruction of Evidence as to SMG (DE 238) reserving the right to raise that portion of the Motion relating to preservation/spoliation of evidence issues after future document production; and (5) SMG strikes/withdraws its Motions to Strike (DE 257 & 259) and the following pleadings filed in support of DE 238, 257 & 259 are withdrawn and rendered moot: DE 248, 249, 252, 254 – 259 & 262. (6) This Consent Order, the parties’ resolution of the above matters and the parties’ withdrawal/dismissal of the above mentioned pleadings obviates the necessity of the August 5, 2014, hearing set by this Court in DE 261. Accordingly, the August 5, 2014, hearing is cancelled. The Court finding that the agreement and consent of the Parties to be well taken, it is so ORDERED. __________________________________ Honorable Joe B. Brown Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court 2 CONSENT ORDER AGREED TO BY: /s/ R. Eddie Wayland R. Eddie Wayland BPR 6045 R. Douglas Hanson, II BPR 017387 Andrew W. Coffman BPR 27160 King & Ballow 315 Union Street 1100 Union Street Plaza Nashville, TN 37201 Email: rew@kingballow.com Email: dhanson@kingballow.com Email: acoffman@kingballow.com Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Robert M. Garfinkle Robert M. Garfinkle (Tenn. Bar. No. 5354) bgarfinkle@gmylaw.com Garfinkle, McLemore & Young, PLLC 2000 Richard Jones Road, Suite 250 Nashville, Tennessee 37215 Telephone: (615) 383-9495 Facsimile: (615) 292-9848 /s/ Joseph C. Sullivan Joseph C. Sullivan (Ga. Bar No. 153098) jsullivan@taylorenglish.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice Taylor English Duma LLP 1600 Parkwood Circle- Suite 400 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 Telephone: (770) 434-6868 Facsimile: (770) 434-7376 Attorneys for Defendants Smokey Mountain Getaways at Town Square, LLC and Jeff Earle 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?