Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. The Consulting Group, Inc. et al
Filing
275
CONSENT ORDER regarding 238 Motion to Prohibit Destruction of Evidence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 8/4/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE
DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
______________________________________________________________________________
WYNDHAM VACATION
RESORTS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
VS.
Case No. 2:12-cv-00096
THE CONSULTANT GROUP, et al.
JURY DEMAND
Defendants.
Magistrate Judge Brown
______________________________________________________________________________
CONSENT ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROHIBIT DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE
______________________________________________________________________________
The Plaintiff, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., and Defendant, Smokey Mountain
Getaways at Town Square, LLC, (“SMG”) are in agreement and it further appearing to the Court
that there is good cause for entry of this Consent Order as to Plaintiff’s Motion to Prohibit
Destruction of Evidence as to SMG (DE 238) as follows:
(1) SMG agrees to preserve all relevant and/or discoverable documents or information
relating to this litigation and will not discard or destroy any such documents or information
including consumer complaints or requests for rescission that reference Wyndham or concern
consumers identified by Wyndham;
(2) In regard to Requests for Production 4 and 5, SMG will produce all consumer
complaints and requests for rescission of consumers either identified by Wyndham or identifiable
as Wyndham timeshare owners. SMG will produce these documents on or before August 18,
2014;
1
(3) SMG will produce the entire content of its customer files for Wyndham owners
including, but not limited to, Wyndham owner files previously produced and such production
will be based on customers identified by Wyndham and/or documents referencing or identifying
a customer as a Wyndham timeshare owner. SMG will produce these documents on or before
August 7, 2014;
(4)
Wyndham dismisses without prejudice its Motion to Prohibit Destruction of
Evidence as to SMG (DE 238) reserving the right to raise that portion of the Motion relating to
preservation/spoliation of evidence issues after future document production; and
(5) SMG strikes/withdraws its Motions to Strike (DE 257 & 259) and the following
pleadings filed in support of DE 238, 257 & 259 are withdrawn and rendered moot: DE 248,
249, 252, 254 – 259 & 262.
(6) This Consent Order, the parties’ resolution of the above matters and the parties’
withdrawal/dismissal of the above mentioned pleadings obviates the necessity of the August 5,
2014, hearing set by this Court in DE 261.
Accordingly, the August 5, 2014, hearing is
cancelled.
The Court finding that the agreement and consent of the Parties to be well taken, it is so
ORDERED.
__________________________________
Honorable Joe B. Brown
Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court
2
CONSENT ORDER AGREED TO BY:
/s/ R. Eddie Wayland
R. Eddie Wayland BPR 6045
R. Douglas Hanson, II BPR 017387
Andrew W. Coffman BPR 27160
King & Ballow
315 Union Street
1100 Union Street Plaza
Nashville, TN 37201
Email: rew@kingballow.com
Email: dhanson@kingballow.com
Email: acoffman@kingballow.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
/s/ Robert M. Garfinkle
Robert M. Garfinkle (Tenn. Bar. No. 5354)
bgarfinkle@gmylaw.com
Garfinkle, McLemore & Young, PLLC
2000 Richard Jones Road, Suite 250
Nashville, Tennessee 37215
Telephone: (615) 383-9495
Facsimile: (615) 292-9848
/s/ Joseph C. Sullivan
Joseph C. Sullivan (Ga. Bar No. 153098)
jsullivan@taylorenglish.com
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Taylor English Duma LLP
1600 Parkwood Circle- Suite 400
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Telephone: (770) 434-6868
Facsimile: (770) 434-7376
Attorneys for Defendants Smokey Mountain
Getaways at Town Square, LLC and Jeff Earle
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?