Hoskins et al v. Cumberland County Board of Education et al

Filing 64

ORDER: Before the Court are Defendant John Tollett's Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket No. 23 , and a Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment Filed by all Defendants (Other Than John Tollett), Docket No. 29 . The Court will treat the mo tion filed by Defendants other than John Tollett as a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons articulated in the accompanying Memorandum, both motions are GRANTED. All of Plaintiffs' federal claims against all Defendants will be dismisse d with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims and dismisses those claims without prejudice. This is the final order in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/17/2014. (hb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
GREGORY HOSKINS and
CAMIE HOSKINS, as parents and
Next of Kin for their Minor Child, T.H.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF
EDUCATION, d/b/A SOUTH
CUMBERLAND ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, and THE PHOENIX SCHOOL;
AARONA VAN WINKLE, Individually and
in her Official Capacity as Director of
Cumberland County Schools;
KEENA INMAN, Individually and in her
Official Capacity as 504 Coordinator for
the Cumberland County School District;
DARRELL THREET, Individually and in
his Official Capacity as Principal of
South Cumberland Elementary School;
BECKY BROWN, Individually and in her
Official Capacity as Principal of South
Cumberland Elementary School and as
504 Coordinator for South Cumberland
Elementary School;
EDDIE NUNLEY, Individually and in his
Official Capacity as Principal of The
Phoenix School;
and JOHN TOLLETT, Individually and
in his Official Capacity as the School
Resource Officer assigned to The Phoenix
School,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:13-cv-15
Judge Sharp

Order
Before the Court are Defendant John Tollett’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket
No. 23, and a Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment Filed by all Defendants (Other Than
John Tollett), Docket No. 29. The Court will treat the motion filed by Defendants other than
John Tollett as a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons articulated in the accompanying
Memorandum, both motions are GRANTED. All of Plaintiffs’ federal claims against all
Defendants will be dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims and dismisses those claims without prejudice.
This is the final order in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE