Partipilo v. Social Security Administration

Filing 25

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 24 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record 14 is herebyDENIED. This case is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/26/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION SAVANNAH LANE PARTIPILO, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:13-0060 Judge Sharp ORDER Magistrate Judge Griffin has entered a 29 page Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 24) in which she (1) finds that the determination by the Commissioner of Social Security that Plaintiff is not disabled under the Social Security Act is supported by substantial evidence in the record as required by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and (2) recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 14) be denied. The Report and Recommendation was issued on January 15, 2015, and no objections have been filed, even though Plaintiff was specifically informed that any objections needed to be filed within fourteen days of service. Having considered the matter de novo, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 24) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket No. 14) is hereby DENIED; and (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?