Flynn v. Hensley et al
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having conducted a de novo review of the record in accordance with Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment for the reasons stat ed by Magistrate Judge Bryant. Accordingly, (1) The R & R (Docket No. 35 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 27 ) is hereby GRANTED; and (3) All remaining Motions (Docket Nos. 18 , 20 & 30 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/30/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
KEITH JARRED FLYNN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DUSTIN HENSLEY, RYAN ASHBURN, )
SEAN MULLIKEN, RICK
)
LANZILOTA,BUTCH BURGESS, and )
CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. 2:14-CV-00060
Judge Sharp
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Bryant has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No.
35) recommending that Defendants’ unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 27) be
granted, that all remaining motions (Docket Nos. 18, 20 & 30) be terminated as moot, and that this
action be dismissed with prejudice. Despite being informed that any objections needed to be filed
within fourteen days of receipt of the R & R, Plaintiff has filed no objections.
Having conducted a de novo review of the record in accordance with Rule 72(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees that Defendants are entitled to summary
judgment for the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Bryant.
Accordingly,
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 35) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 27) is hereby GRANTED; and
(3) All remaining Motions (Docket Nos. 18, 20 & 30) are DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58.
1
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?