Mixon v. Social Security Administration

Filing 24

ORDER: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED; the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny benefits is REVERSED; and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/2/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION EMILY V. MIXON-DAVIS Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:14-cv-00067 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Magistrate Judge Holmes has entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) in which she recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) be granted and that the Commissioner’s decision denying Social Security benefits be reversed and remanded. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Having conducted the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED; the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny benefits is REVERSED; and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?