Mixon v. Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED; the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny benefits is REVERSED; and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/2/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
EMILY V. MIXON-DAVIS
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:14-cv-00067
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Holmes has entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) in which
she recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16)
be granted and that the Commissioner’s decision denying Social Security benefits be reversed and
remanded. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Having conducted
the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees
with the recommended disposition.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is hereby ACCEPTED and
APPROVED; Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 16) is
GRANTED; the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny benefits is REVERSED; and
this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?