Blatt v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Entry of this Order shall constitute the judgment in this action. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/17/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WAYNE BLATT, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-00015
Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. Defendant Capital
One Auto Finance filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Wayne Blatt’s claims for
violation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693e. (Docket No. 30.) Plaintiff
Blatt filed a Response in Opposition of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and CrossMotion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 38.) Defendant filed a Reply. (Docket No.
For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court GRANTS
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Entry of this Order shall constitute the judgment in this action.
It is SO ORDERED.
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?