Flatt v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
16
ORDER: Having conducted the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 12 ) is DENIED; and the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny benefits is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/16/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
CATHY ELLEN FLATT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security, )
)
Defendant.
)
No. 2:16-cv-00018
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Frensley has entered a lengthy Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15)
in which he recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc.
No. 12) be denied. No objections have been filed.
Having conducted the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; Plaintiff’s Motion for
Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; and the Commissioner of Social
Security’s decision to deny benefits is AFFIRMED.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?