Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. City of Cookeville, Tennessee et al

Filing 37

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiff Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose, LLC's Motion to Remand (Docket No. 21 ) is hereby GRANTED, but its request for attorneys fees is DENIED. This case is hereby RE MANDED to the Circuit Court of Putnam County, Tennessee. With these rulings, the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Cookeville (Docket No. 3 ) and Putnam County (Docket No. 17 ) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/14/2016. (xc: Circuit Court of Putnam County Clerk's Office by certified mail.)(hb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION NORMA FAYE PYLES LYNCH FAMILY PURPOSE, LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF COOKEVILLE, ) TENNESSEE, acting through the City ) Council and the Planning Commission, ) and PUTNAM COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendants. ) No. 2:16-00025 Judge Sharp ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Plaintiff Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose, LLC’s Motion to Remand (Docket No. 21) is hereby GRANTED, but its request for attorney’s fees is DENIED. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Putnam County, Tennessee. With these rulings, the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Cookeville (Docket No. 3) and Putnam County (Docket No. 17) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. It is SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?