Kirby v. United States of America

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence (Docket No. 1 ) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/25/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION RAYMOND LEE KIRBY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:16-cv-00039 Judge Trauger ORDER Pending before the court are the Petitioner’s Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence In Accordance With 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket No. 1), the Government’s Response (Docket No. 5), the Petitioner’s Reply (Docket No. 6), and the Government’s Supplemental Response (Docket No. 7). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence (Docket No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. If the Petitioner gives timely notice of an appeal from the court’s Memorandum and Order, such notice shall be treated as a application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which will not issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002). It is so ORDERED. Enter this 25th day of May 2017. _______________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?