Hamilton v. United States of America
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Petitioner's Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence In Accordance With 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 1 ) is GRANTED. The Petitioner will be re-sentenced by separate order in Criminal Case No. 2:10-cr-00015. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 9/19/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
COOKEVILLE DIVISION
KENNETH HAMILTON,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NOS. 2:16-cv-00045
2:16-cv-00049
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Pending before the Court are the Petitioner’s Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct
Sentence In Accordance With 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 1), the Petitioner’s Supplemental Brief
(Doc. No. 7), and the Government’s Response (Doc. No. 10). For the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Petitioner’s Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct
Sentence In Accordance With 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED. The Petitioner will
be re-sentenced by separate order in Criminal Case No. 2:10-cr-00015.
This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?